• image
  • image
  • image
  • image
  • image
Previous Next

Is underground water storage the answer to water security?

By Russell Sticklor

An empty groundwater recharge basin outside of Tucson Arizona United States. Photo byBillAn empty groundwater recharge basin outside of Tucson Arizona United States. Photo byBillGroundwater is arguably the most important aspect of our collective water security in the 21st century. Farmers draw upon it as a sort of water insurance policy when the rains falter, or when surface supplies prove inadequate. But we take it for granted, in part because — historically speaking — groundwater has been essentially invisible beneath our feet until very recently.

With the advent of satellite-based remotesensing technology, we now have grown increasingly aware this crucial water resource is in serious danger, and being pumped far faster than it can recharge in many parts of the world. To improve our resiliency to a shifting climate and extend our growing seasons, we must seriously consider not just pumping groundwater to the surface, as we have always done, but also storing today’s surface waters underground to ensure our water security for tomorrow.

Enter the long-discussed but little-implemented intervention that could go a long way toward bolstering water-supply resiliency in arid and semi-arid regions — underground water storage.

How does it work?

Underground water storage — also known as managed aquifer recharge — is the process of purposefully refilling aquifers with surface water in order to more effectively manage water supply. This can be achieved by either directly injecting surface waters into aquifers via wells, or by filling recharge basins (such as the one pictured above) that allow surface waters to slowly percolate downwards into the groundwater table below.

In the state of Arizona in the southwestern United States, aquifer recharge has already emerged as important tool to battle chronic water scarcity. In 2006, for example, the state’s Tonopah Desert Recharge Project became operational, with a goal of storing 185 million cubic meters of water annually. Using 19 recharge basins spread out across 83 hectares, the project allowed surface waters to slowly refill the underlying aquifer, with progress measured by monitoring wells.

Within three years, the operation had successfully stored 600 million cubic meters of water underground, exceeding expectations and improving the area’s water security. When water was required again at the surface for irrigation or municipal use, wells and pipelines were used to pump the recharged groundwater as needed. Those supplies could then be transferred elsewhere in the region via a nearby canal.

Pilot studies are currently exploring the applicability of underground water storage in other drought-prone parts of the world. To date, experts and development practitioners are confident the technology has the potential to be significantly scaled-up in many regions, although the effectiveness of underground storage varies according to soil composition and the type of aquifer in a given region. For Karen Villholth, a groundwater management specialist for the International Water Management Institute (IWMI) in South Africa, underground storage “could play a significant role in semi-arid and arid parts of Africa — such as Botswana and South Africa — where episodically heavy rains occur, and where surface water storage and transfer options are exhausted.”

Meanwhile, many research initiatives and pilot projects are also now pushing the envelope of underground storage technology and exploring its potential suitability for locations as diverse as India, the United States, Thailand, Australia, Central Asia, and even small island states like the Maldives.

“In principle, there are possibilities to enhance underground storage in many geological settings,” says Vladimir Smakhtin, theme leader on water availability and access for IWMI. “The extent of course will differ.” Climate change and the need for better water storage As climate change makes seasonal precipitation and surface flows increasingly erratic, the need for improved storage techniques has become more acute than ever. Experts agree storing water underground is far more efficient than storing water in surface reservoirs. This is because storing water underground minimizes evaporation, which is a major cause of water loss in surface reservoirs in arid and semi-arid climates. Underground storage can accommodate far greater variability in demand from farmers, particularly during drought or the dry season when irrigation water may be needed most. “It can help greatly in improving water use efficiency in both rain-fed areas and in irrigation areas by helping to better match water availability with demand,” says Paul Pavelic, a hydrogeological expert and groundwater specialist with IWMI.

Pavelic says recharging aquifers with wet season rain bolsters water security by offering “protection againstclimate variability” by making groundwater available “where and when it is needed.” Rural livelihoods during the dry season stand to improve as a result. By providing additional groundwater for irrigation, recharged aquifers mean “farmers can increase the number of cropping seasons,” adds Brindha Karthikeyan, a surface and groundwater specialist with IWMI’s Laos office. What other policy measures or infrastructure investments might be combined with underground storage to more effectively use groundwater in a sustainable manner and i mprove our climate resiliency?

About the Author

Russell Sticklor is a water specialist and environmental journalist covering the intersection of climate change, population growth, and human security. He has worked with media, government, and the NGO community, and is most recently co-author of “Water and Conflict: A Toolkit for Programming” (U.S. Agency for International Development, 2014).

For more information please visit:http://wle.cgiar.org/blogs/2014/04/22/underground-waterstorage-answer-water-security/

 

                           


            

Current Issue: Africa Water & Sanitation & Hygiene March-April 2017 Vol.12 No.2